« JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY--FEDERAL | Main | JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS »

JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

June 17, 2009

Chief Justice Paul De Muniz
Supreme Court of Oregon
1163 State St.
Salem, OR 97301-2563


Re: Judicial Performance Evaluations in Oregon

Dear Hon. De Muniz:

The purpose of this letter is to recommend a formal statewide judicial performance evaluation system in Oregon. Specifically, where does The Supreme Court of Oregon stand on a formal statewide system of Judicial Performance Evaluations (JPE) for the judiciary in Oregon?

Enclosed you will find an outline of the presentation I made to the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors on June 12, 2009 in Tigard. I am taking the liberty of sending a copy of this communication to your Court members. May I direct your particular attention to the Blueprint for Judicial Performance Evaluations (Exhibit #5) compiled by University of Denver's Law School. Of all of the proposed templates for this subject, I believe this is the best one. I would be interested in meeting with you soon on JPE or otherwise cooperating with the Court and you to further study this worthwhile program. Accountability is lacking in Oregon's judiciary. Judicial evaluations would solve this problem, aid in providing information to Oregon's voters and possibly raise the esteem of the legal profession in our state. My specific recommendation is as follows:

Recommendation -- I recommend that a Task Force be formed under the auspices of Oregon's Public Official's Compensation Commission to study and implement a formal statewide judicial performance evaluation program in Oregon using the Blueprint (Exhibit #5) as a guide.

Thank you for your interest and consideration in these regards.

Very truly yours,


Lauren Paulson

enc.
cc Oregon State Bar

Lauren Paulson
971 219 5859
laurenjpaulson@yahoo.com
bulletinsfromaloha.org

Posted on Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 10:14AM by Registered CommenterLAUREN PAULSON | CommentsPost a Comment | References5 References

References (5)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: sacs lancel
    BULLETINS FROM ALOHA - WEEKLY BULLETINSl - JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
  • Response
    BULLETINS FROM ALOHA - WEEKLY BULLETINSl - JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
  • Response
    Response: UGG som støvler
    BULLETINS FROM ALOHA - WEEKLY BULLETINSl - JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
  • Response
    Response: baby blå uggs
    BULLETINS FROM ALOHA - WEEKLY BULLETINSl - JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
  • Response
    BULLETINS FROM ALOHA - WEEKLY BULLETINSl - JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>