When one dies the process of erasure begins.  Things you held dear are disbursed to those interested or to the scrap heap.  After the optional 'obits', it is unlikely further ink will be spilt on your behalf.  Here it is told how Oregon lawyers are simply erased by the Oregon State Bar before a lawyer's professional death . 


     For me it began in 2001.  You see, the Oregon State Bar has an efficient erasure program not unlike Hitler's pogrom of years ago and for the same purpose:

1.  Lawyer Referral Service  --  For small-town lawyers there is a worthwhile Bar program to connect the public in need of simple legal services with lawyers who specialize in those areas of the law and at low cost to the public.  For lawyers, it could lead to a solid, loyal clientele. For the public, they can get a legal question answered for a nominal fee.    However, once a lawyer gets a bar complaint, specious or otherwise, one is erased from this referral service and a steady source of income. 

2.  Bar Complaints  --  Once a lawyer has a bar complaint lodged against them, it immediately becomes a public record and the Bar gratuitously ensures that it is on the internet  --  for the protection of the public, of course.  Never mind the complaint may come from a client who simply does not want to pay their bill or is otherwise lacking in merit.  On the other hand, when a judge has a complaint lodged against them, it is confidential.  Almost half of the Oregon lawyers surveyed in 2002 feel the Bar's disciplinary system is biased against them. 

3.  Bar Directory  --  You will not find Sally Leisure's name there.  This is because she was successful in defending herself against a specious bar complaint that ruined her career.  Undaunted, the Bar went after her again and now she is erased.

You will not find my name in the 2007 Oregon State Bar directory either even though I have been an Oregon lawyer since 1973 and am nice to small animals. 

4.  The Media  --  There is a cozy relationship between the Bar and The Oregonian.  Roger Weidner, a former public prosecutor, tried to point this out while he sought to expose the corruption in the Oregon Bar and the Oregon court system.  At first, he received favorable rulings by highly respected judges.  Then he faced rulings by judges that are an embarrassment to Oregon's legal system, yet the low quality of some of Oregon's judiciary is unreported by The Oregonian.  Indeed, The Oregonian did away with their valuable judicial evaluation stories years ago.    When Mr. Weidner tried to confront the corruption of Oregon's legal system, he became the victim and his story squelched. 

     The Oregonian has placed two sensational, negative articles in their papers about me without asking my side of the story.  Indeed, no reporter from The Oregonian will even return my telephone calls, nor respond to my emails, nor publish my press releases.  Nor anything.  I have been erased from their public. 

5.  The Courts  --  I have practiced in Washington County for twenty years.  The Washington County Court Administrator called me recently, and in a nervous voice, advised me that my electronic court building pass had been revoked.  He said that he had never been asked to do this before and apologized.

6.  Cyberspace  --  When you are an Oregon lawyer you pay to participate in online legal research services.  I have been erased from this service.  If you google me you will learn that the Bar took me to task for charging my client $67.50 too much, in their view.  But you won't find my side to the story there.  It has been erased. 

7.  The Oregon Supreme Court  --  Even though I have been President of the Washington County Bar Association,  a member of the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors (the policy-making body of the OSB) and a member of the  House of Delegates (the legislature of the OSB) for two terms, the Oregon Supreme Court wants me erased.  You see, I speak out. 

While I served on the Bar Board of Governors for two years (2003-2004), not once did any member of the Oregon Supreme Court attend any meetings of the Board of Governors in Lake Oswego.  Not once did any member of the Oregon Supreme Court ever deign to speak with me while I was part of Bar leadership even during the court budgetary crisis of 2003 when local lawyer input could have been useful.   

I have practiced appellate law in Oregon for twenty years, but not once has the Oregon Supreme Court deigned to review any one of my client's twelve cases filed before them on discretionary review.  Moreover, they never have said why.  I am invisible to them.  There is an unholy alliance between the Oregon State Bar and the Oregon Supreme Court which permeates all these issues resulting in offending Oregon lawyers being unfairly dispatched to oblivian. 

Recently, I have written several times to the Oregon Supreme Court asking for a response on a specific case.  They will not respond to any of my formal, polite letters.  To them and to the Oregon State Bar I have been almost totally erased. 

8.  The Oregon State Bar  --  They want to be sure you  know if I have done something bad as a lawyer,as the Bar views the world.    If I have done something good for the general order of legal jurisprudence in Oregon I am ignored. 

9.  The Oregon State Bar Board of Governors  --  They erased me in 2004.  I have formally requested to be put on the Board of Governor's agenda several times for the good of the order, but they have not responded.  My representative there lowers her head in the foxhole when I requested her help.

10.  Friends and Family  --  It is like if one has been diagnosed with cancer or leprosy.  Family and friends are uneasy.  They know something is amiss, but are afraid to ask.  I practice in the same community where I grew up.  Former classmates are similarly unsure about me. 

It isn't just me.  There are lots of us erased lawyers in Oregon.  But, you simply don't know where we are and you don't hear from us because we have been erased and, ergo, silenced by the Oregon State Bar. 

Posted on Monday, August 13, 2007 at 11:53AM by Registered CommenterLAUREN PAULSON in | Comments3 Comments | References3 References

References (3)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    NFL is really one of the biggest sports in America. It has a major following.
  • Response
  • Response
    Market Research Vietnam is a leading Asia focussed marketing strategy consultancy firm.

Reader Comments (3)

Very useful and informative article! Thanks the author!

January 31, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterValeria

it's really a good forum, and I love it very much, welcome to my little site dofus kamas

February 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGodness

I just got done erasing a member of the hallowed State BAR, the Oregonian ran four articles on Micheal R. Shinn, in one the Oregonian DID give him a chance to respond in a followup article the day after the first which ran the week of Aug 13th and the second on 14th 2008.

The first was a result of the BAR filing a Supreme Court case against Shinn, the second was his shy responce to the charges in which he admitted he used my funds for his own gain, and was quoted as "that was a mistake" this was published in the Oregonian and is a matter of public record.

The next one the Oregonian published also on the public record, was about his violating the courts order to stop dispensing funds from his client trust account, which he violated within days of the court order which he signed off on and agreed to desist such activity without the BAR being informed of such activities.

The forth article came out last week on 9/12/09 on the trial panel's recommendation that he be disbarred. He did all of this to himself. Every word of this is backed up by very public records at the State BAR offices. The CSF has finally ruled the fund will not remunerate me for my losses, So now it's between me and the PLF, which is like pulling a tooth from a dentist, a dentist will always save the tooth, at the patient's expense, that would be me. I'm out $65,000.00. All public record.

Now for the real meat and potatoes, I am working on the idea that the BAR only took action that after the fact that my funds are gone, and now the CSF won't pay out, the PLF will deny me, Shinn is broke and is being sued for millions by others, and I am out in the cold.I have an attorney but it remains to be seen if I'll get a dime. The people of Oregon deserve better then this from the BAR, The PLF should be converted over to a real insurance company which then would have to answer to the insurance commissioners office, In each district of the State BAR's LPRB, and the SPRB should have one public volunteer who cannot have a member of their family be an attorney in any state,and be seated on the Board of Governors at the BAR with FULL voting rights to represent the public interests, with veto power. Clearly the people need to play more of an active role in the Board of Governors.

In short the BAR needs a complete remake or be gotten rid of completely. I'm for the former rather then the latter. This is getting to be a movement by many others who agree with me as they too have been screwed by either their attorneys or the BAR. I bent over backwards to help the BAR in this investigation for two and half years, and this is there way of thanking me, "none for you, thank you for your help though".

I support the J.A.I.L. concept for Judges too.

One who knows the hard way.

September 18, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAnother one who knows

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>