« OPENING PAGE -- First Edition -- Volume 1 | Main

Welcome To a New Blog Site Dedicated to the Lawyers of Oregon

In 2003 I had the privilege to chair the thirty-year reunion of the Class of 1973 at  " Northwestern School of Law of Lewis and Clark College " as my diploma reads.  Being realistic, I know that I was lucky to get in to this fine law school being painfully aware of my mediocre grades from college.  In 1970 the doors opened to the new law school as now configured near the Lewis and Clark campus.  But in 1970 there were a number of us who were radicals and even cheeky enough to call the new Dean Fred Fagg on the carpet because we were unsatisfied with the education we were receiving from a new faculty.  In short, we blazed the trail at this new fine facility.

The Class of 1973 attended the dedication of the new law school by United States Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas who warned of the dangers of nuclear energy.  He was accompanied by his youthful wife.  Yes, even Professor Ron Lansing was our sterling teacher in the ways of the Rule of Law.

Since 1973 I have watched my profession steadily deteriorate.  We were taught that we are a country subject to the Rule of Law.  The Rule of Law means literally---  A legal principle, of general application, sanctioned by the recognition of the authorities and usually expressed in the form of a maxim or logical proposition.  John Rawls, a professor at Harvard, provides a broader view in his book , A Theory of Justice.  There Rawls speaks of The Rule of Law as a protection of citizens through the regular and impartial administration of public rules.  The Rule of Law fails us when judges or others in authority do not care enough to apply the appropriate 'rule' to your factual circumstance.  In law school we learned our craft by the case law method.  As advocates we then articulate the case law which controls our client's factual case to the local judge.  To my (and my client's) dismay, I have learned that many judges do not even bother to read my legal materials submitted much less the cases cited.  The recourse is an appeal (expensive and time consuming), a complaint to the Judicial Fitness Commission (which does nothing) or turn out the offending judge at the next election.  The last remedy has become meaningless.  In 2006 the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors reversed a decision by the same body in 2004 to require statewide judicial evaluations on all Oregon judges.  A curious politically correct decision.

The thirty-year reunion went well.  We even had real cajun shrimp (eaten with the heads still on!!), a tradition inaugurated during our time in law school by Bert Buford from Louisiana.  But something has changed.  Lewis and Clark no longer refers to it's law school by its real name--Northwestern School of Law.   Nor does the present law school administration regard this Class of 1973 as anything special.  We do! One of our members can legitimately be called Oregon's King of Torts because he has secured some of the largest jury verdicts in the state.  Sadly, one of our members committed suicide in a lonely setting near the Columbia Gorge.  Another has been convicted of a felony, tossed off the Bar yet remains a contributor.  One of our members has been suspended in disgrace from the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors.  I read about one of my law school friends in the disciplinary pages; nothing there resembled this friend who had won the Moot Court competition in law school.  Our story yet unfolds. 

Posted on Sunday, February 4, 2007 at 02:06PM by Registered CommenterLAUREN PAULSON | Comments2 Comments

Reader Comments (2)

What a great idea. This is long overdue

February 4, 2007 | Registered CommenterLAUREN PAULSON

Before the House of Delegates came into being I did in fact feel a connection to the OSB. The meetings were cantankerous and sometimes outrageous. Nonetheless, it was real democracy in action. Many of the proposals by the "leaders" of the bar were soundly defeated. Other proposals, made by a single member, were approved. After we went to a House of Delegates system, the annual convention, the only activity that seemed to glue all Oregon lawyers together, for all practial purposes disappeared. We have become ordinary citizens, paying our taxes [dues] and bitching about government [OSB] because we feel that we have no voice.

As an example, had the new building proposal been put to a vote of the membership, it would have been defeated. I made my comment about it, claiming that it could be put anyplace within 30 miles of Portland at half the cost of the land, and got two responses: the first came from a lawyer on the committee that put the thing together, stating that as a man experienced in real estate it was a good deal for the bar to buy the land in Tigard; the second was from an OSB staff person stating that there were so many staff people that it would be a hardship for them to have to drive another 50-60 miles per day. I think our general membership would not have been swayed by either argument.

So, someone else has decided to raise our dues to buy an expensive lot to build an expensive building. This process builds resentment.

June 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterCharles J. Merten

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>